SC House Candidate Addresses DUI Arrest – FITSNews
MUD FLIES EARLY IN LOWCOUNTRY. Things move pretty fast in modern politics. Within fifteen minutes of this website posting a preview of the upcoming special election for South Carolina House District 113 , we received an anonymous email alleging that one of the candidates had recently been arrested for driving under the influence. Angela Hanyak, one of three Democrats running for the seat, was arrested in February of this year for DUI and an expired vehicular registration. What happened? Before we get to that, it’s important to note Hanyak wasn’t convicted of DUI – nor did she plead guilty to the charge. That’s obviously pertinent information, as a DUI conviction or guilty plea is obviously a vastly different situation than an arrest which ultimately leads to a lesser charge. According to sources familiar with the situation, Hanyak simply made a wrong turn in downtown Charleston, S.C. one evening after leaving a dinner engagement with a friend – and after being pulled over by a city police officer, acknowledged that she had consumed an alcoholic beverage prior to getting behind the wheel. “While I’m not proud of the circumstances that led to the incident, the experience taught me a great deal about how our legal system does – and in some ways does not – work for everyday South Carolinians,” Hanyak told us. “If the opposition is already coming at her with this, then they are trying to cover up their own inadequacies, whether it be from a lack of campaign infrastructure or fundraising success,” noted consultant David Carter, who is advising Hanyak. “Furthermore, it shows that they don’t believe they have a message that they can win with. People are tired of politics as usual and they are looking for someone who is willing to roll up their sleeves and actually work for them. Angela Hanyak is that person.” In addition to Hanyak, local pastor Chris Collins and politically connected attorney Marvin Pendarvis are also seeking the Democratic nomination for this seat. Partisan primary elections have been scheduled for September 5. A Democratic runoff election would follow on September 19, if necessary.
IN RE: Charleston Municipal Court Judge Joseph S. MENDELSOHN
FACTS. Respondent is a municipal court judge for the City of Charleston. While there, respondent learned that, under procedures established by the Mount Pleasant Chief Municipal Judge, the bond for DUI was $1,002. Instead, under the established procedures, Judge Mendelsohn would be transferred to the Charleston County Detention Facility where he would remain until a bond hearing could be held the next morning at approximately 8:00 a.m. Respondent knew the Mount Pleasant procedure was not the same as the procedure used in Charleston. After speaking with the sergeant, the Mount Pleasant judge explained the policy to respondent. After first attempting to telephone another Charleston County magistrate, respondent contacted Charleston County Magistrate James B. Gosnell, Jr. Magistrate Gosnell was unfamiliar with the Mount Pleasant bond procedure. After the lieutenant explained the procedure, Magistrate Gosnell remarked that he would go to the bond court and conduct a bond hearing for respondent that night. Magistrate Gosnell asked that respondent be brought directly to bond court rather than first being booked into the detention center. Respondent was released from the Charleston County Detention Center at approximately 2:30 a.m. Respondent represents his contact with Magistrate Gosnell and others was only for the purpose of determining the validity of the Mount Pleasant bond procedure, which he believed to be illegal, and was not to obtain preferential treatment or to be excused from the established procedure. Respondent acknowledges that his contact with other judges concerning his ability to post bond has the appearance of seeking preferential treatment. Respondent further represents he did not ask Magistrate Gosnell to set a bond outside the established procedure. Respondent agreed to and did forfeit bond on the DUI and open liquor offenses. LAW. Respondent used his judicial office to evade the policies of the arresting jurisdiction in order to obtain a non-scheduled bond hearing and early release from jail.
Welcome To Phipps Law Firm
Charleston DUI Attorney Edward L. Phipps is a former DUI officer who now represents individuals and families throughout Charleston and surrounding counties in South Carolina. They support individuals and families in the areas of automobile accidents, personal injury, business law and litigation, family law, DUI, and criminal defense cases. With a reputation for their experience handling DUI cases, you will appreciate the detailed attention provided to your case as well as legal skills, knowledge, customer service, and a winning attitude. If you’ve been charged with driving under the influence, your best protection is a Charleston DUI attorney with experience. Charleston DUI Attorney Edward L. Phipps, a former traffic officer, knows the ins and outs of DUI cases. With an in-depth understanding of DUI detection methods, and how they can prove or disprove a case, our firm has the knowledge to fight for you. With years of experience in DUI enforcement, as well as defense and prosecution, Charleston DUI Attorneys at the Phipps Law Firm have devised five concepts that explain the process of DUI cases: 1) The “You”, 2) The “Impaired Driving”, 3) The “Field Sobriety Tasks”, 4) The “Blood Alcohol Content”, and 5) The “Defense Lawyer”. These key concepts help you learn, understand, and appreciate the challenging process of getting a successful outcome to a DUI case. Most people don’t realize that there is much more to any DUI case than the information an officer uses when deciding to make an arrest. Because there is pressure in the form of incentives, statistics and hype surrounding drunk driving, an officer may be very aggressive when deciding to charge a driver with a DUI. If you have been charged with a DUI, you should hire a lawyer with the knowledge, experience and proven track record for successfully defending DUI’s in the state. With Charleston DUI Attorney Edward L. Phipps, you’ll work with an experienced attorney who will aggressively fight on your behalf. The Phipps Firm is conveniently located in historic downtown Charleston, near Mount Pleasant.